Comparison Library

Public, source-governed comparison pages

Compare ideas without losing the evidence.

This public library contains only baseline files selected by the checked public index. Working drafts and owner-review material stay outside the public package.Every visible card is supplied by the checked public index.

Method

The governed comparison method tests bounded claim atoms through three separate content lenses: functional or operational equivalence, narrative or causal-interface architecture, and Detective Mode working backward from matching conclusions. A fourth, longitudinal lens checks how a program changes over time; it cannot create a content match by itself. A supported partial mapping remains visible even when a full operator or equation differs.

Coverage

The governed corpus currently contains 327 substantive rival programs. This preflight package exposes 15 indexed content pages plus this landing page: 16 PUBLIC-classified files, with zero owner-review projections promoted. Omission means that a page is held, under review, source-gated, or not yet selected for publication; it does not mean that the underlying comparison was negative or that the wider corpus is complete.

Provenance

The release contract requires publication candidates to be tied to dated versions, claim-bearing locators, and reproducible source links. It also requires named earlier work to be allocated atom by atom rather than treated as an author-wide floor, with target-only, Micah-only, and genuinely opposite residuals kept explicit.

Limitations

These findings compare public content and chronology. They do not establish access, dependence, copying, intent, motive, or misconduct. A bounded partial relation is not an equation identity or a full-mechanism identity, and quantitative sigma language is not used without a frozen, calibrated statistical null.

Public comparisons

Loading checked index…